JustinsAuntPatr...'s profileWelcome to the Insanity!PhotosBlogLists Tools Help

Blog


    20 June

    Food for thought

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    Our neighbor who rarely sends us anything more than daily chit chat to keep in touch via her new toy (the computer) sent us something that I wanted to share with you. It may upset some of you but as you know this space is dedicated to my nephew who was wounded for our continued freedom. This speaks volumes to us; any comments out there?
     

    Could Not Be Said Better
    Written by a housewife from New Jersey and sounds like it! This is one pissed off lady.

    "Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001?

    Were people from all over the world, mostly Americans, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac from our nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania ? Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

    And I'm supposed to care that a copy of the Koran was "desecrated" when an overworked American soldier kicked it or got it wet?...Well, I don't. I don't care at all.

    I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.

    I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere possession of which is a crime in Saudi Arabia

    I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg 's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

    I'll care when the cowardly so-called "insurgents" in Iraq come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques.

    I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

    I'll care when the American media stops pretending that their First Amendment liberties are somehow derived from international law instead of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights.

    In the meantime, when I hear a story about a brave marine roughing up an Iraqi terrorist to obtain information, know this: I don't care.

    When I see a fuzzy photo of a pile of naked Iraqi prisoners who have been humiliated in what amounts to a college-hazing incident, rest assured: I don't care.

    When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank: I don't care.

    When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed "special" food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being "mishandled," you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts: I don't care.

    And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled "Koran" and other times "Quran." Well, Jimmy Crack Corn and -you guessed it -I don't care ! ! ! ! !

    If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your e-mail friends. Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behavior!

    If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great country! And may I add:

    "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem." -- Ronald Reagan

    I have another quote that I would like to add AND.......I hope you forward all this.

    "If we ever forget that we're One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under." Also by..Ronald Reagan

    One last thought for the day:

    In case we find ourselves starting to believe all the anti-American sentiment and negativity, we should remember England 's Prime Minister Tony Blair 's words during a recent interview. When asked by one of his Parliament members why he believes so much in America , he said:

    "A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in... And how many want out."

    Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
    1. Jesus Christ
    2. The American G. I.
    One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
    19 June

    This cannot happen!

     
     
    Hello everyone!
     
     
    I was surfing the 'net and found this insane story that I caught a bit of this morning before heading to work. I have loved this show forever and if it's true I will have a very hard time supporting CBS in any form and will write a protest letter and start a letter campaign to stop it. Would you join me?
     

    LOS ANGELES - “The Price Is Right” needs a host, and Rosie O’Donnell is interested. Very interested.

    The 45-year-old said on her blog recently that she was meeting with the “Price” people this week and that she “sure would” accept the job if they offer.

    “I LOVE THE PRICE IS RIGHT,” she wrote, the capitalization underscoring her feelings.

    CBS and FremantleMedia North America, which produces the hit game show, have been seeking a replacement for the venerable Bob Barker, who retired this month after 35 years as the show’s host.

    Among those reportedly in the running are Todd Newton of the E! network, Mark Steines of “Entertainment Tonight,” George Hamilton and John O’Hurley. But Barker said O’Donnell is his pick.

    “She knows the show,” he said backstage at Friday’s Daytime Emmy Awards. “There’s no doubt in my mind she could do the show. Now, whether they want a lady host, I don’t know. I’ve never heard that discussed. As far as I know, they’ve only auditioned men.”

    CBS and FremantleMedia had no comment Tuesday.

    O’Donnell’s spokeswoman, Cindi Berger, was not specific about the ex-“View” commentator’s plans: “Rosie is meeting with several networks about a lot of different ideas.”

    “The Price Is Right” is filmed in Los Angeles. O’Donnell lives in Nyack, New York, near New York City, with her partner and their four children.

    None of these options would work in my opinion ~ I always thought that the unseen announcer was being groomed for the position. CBS wake up; you have a cash cow and if you pick the wrong person, you will lose 35 years of success in less than two months!

    Happy update:

    Barker offers to fill in if needed on ‘Price’

    ‘If they wanted me to do it for a few more months, I would do it,’ he says

    Bob Barker Finale
    Legendary game show host Bob Barker, 83, waves to the audience during taping of his final episode of "The Price Is Right" with two of the show's models in Los Angeles on June 6. However, it might not be Barker's last show after all.
     

     

     

     

    LOS ANGELES - After 35 years as the host of “The Price Is Right,” Bob Barker hung up his microphone for good on Wednesday. Or did he?

    After taping his last show, the 83-year-old icon said he would happily return to the “Price” stage if a replacement host isn’t found by the time the new season starts in the fall.

    “They’re having trouble finding someone to do the show,” Barker told reporters during a post-show press conference. “And I’ve told members of the staff here that ... if they wanted me to do it for a few more months, I would do it.

    “I don’t want to walk out on CBS or the company if they’re in that position because they’ve been too good to me.”

    The production company left the door open Thursday on the possibility of such a return.

    “I am glad to know that Bob is thinking about coming back!” said Cecile Frot-Coutaz, CEO of FremantleMedia North America. “We haven’t made our final decision yet because, as you can imagine, we want to make sure that we leave no stones unturned.”

    Barker taped his last episode — his 6,586th — of the popular CBS game show Wednesday, retiring after five decades on national television. The episode is scheduled to air twice June 15: once at its usual time and again that evening.The silver-haired host ended his record tenure by blowing kisses and working in the same low-key, genial fashion that made him one of daytime TV’s biggest stars. He closed the show with his usual, “Help control the pet population, have your pets spayed or neutered. Goodbye everybody.”

    Once the cameras stopped rolling, he told the studio audience: “I thank you, thank you, thank you for inviting me into your home for more than 50 years. I’m truly grateful, and I hope that all of you have enjoyed your visit to ‘The Price Is Right.”’

    Reruns of Barker-hosted shows will play throughout the summer.

    Damian Dovarganes / AP

     

     

    17 June

    Fun Quiz to take

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    You must, must take this quiz. It will only take a minute and it will blow your mind, guaranteed!
     

    YOUR  AGE   BY  EATING  OUT

     

    Don't tell me your age; you probably would tell a falsehood anyway-but your waiter may know!

    YOUR AGE BY DINER & RESTAURANT MATH

     

    DON'T CHEAT BY SCROLLING DOWN FIRST!

    It takes less than a minute.  Work this out as you read .

    Be sure you don't read the bottom until you've worked it out!

    This is not one of those waste of time things, it's fun.

    1. First of all, pick the number of times a week that you would like to go out to eat.

    (more than once but less than 10)

    2. Multiply this number by 2 (just to be bold)

    3. Add 5

    4. Multiply it by 50

    5. If you have already had your birthday this year add 1757...

    If you haven't, add 1756.

     

    6. Now subtract the four digit year that you were born.

    You should have a three digit number.

    The first digit of this was your original number. (I.e., How many times you want to go out to restaurants in a week.)

    The next two numbers are

    YOUR AGE ! ------ (Oh YES, it is!!!)

     

    Didn't that blow your mind? Be honest!

     

    Did you know?

     

     Hello everyone!

    I was surfing the 'net and found a possible explanation to why Wal-Mart has been having so much trouble lately. I am at Wally World a lot as you know and I have noticed something was different but couldn't put my hand on it. Comments out there?

     

    Wal-Mart theft: $3 billion a year?

    With the retailer's theft loss rate approaching the industrywide average, analysts cite a policy of not prosecuting minor shoplifting cases, former insiders say the problem is reduced security, and critics blame employee discontent.

    By The Associated Press

    Shoppers at Wal-Mart stores across America are loading carts with merchandise -- maybe a flat-screen TV, a few DVDs or a six-pack of beer -- and strolling out without paying. Employees also are helping themselves to goods they haven't paid for.

    The world's largest retailer is saying little about these kinds of thefts, but its recent public disclosures that it is experiencing an increase in so-called "shrinkage" at its U.S. stores suggests that inventory losses due to shoplifting, employee theft, paperwork errors and supplier fraud could be worsening.

    The hit is likely to rise to more than $3 billion this year for Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs), which generated sales of $348.6 billion last year, according to retail consultant Burt Flickinger III.

    Flickinger and other analysts say the increase in theft may be tied to Wal-Mart's highly publicized decision last year to no longer prosecute minor cases of shoplifting in order to focus on organized shoplifting rings. Former employees say staffing levels, including security personnel, have been reduced, making it easier for theft to occur. And a union-backed group critical of the retailer's personnel policies contends general worker discontent is playing a role.

    Wal-Mart declined to offer any explanations for the rise in losses but denied it has cut security staff and said employee morale is rising rather than falling.

    Although Wal-Mart declined to reveal any details, analysts suspect Wal-Mart -- which for years had a theft loss rate that was half that of its peers -- is getting closer to the industrywide average.

    Theft is a big problem for all retailers, costing them $41.6 billion last year, according to a joint study released this week by the National Retail Federation and the University of Florida. The study found that the theft rate as a percentage of sales ticked upward slightly to 1.61% of sales in 2006 from 1.60% in 2005.

    A profit killer

    Whatever the cause, such theft -- which late founder Sam Walton once called one of retailers' top profit killers -- adds one more challenge when Wal-Mart is already struggling with sluggish sales at its established stores due to an overall economic slowdown as well as its own stumbles in its home- and apparel-merchandising strategies.

    Eduardo Castro-Wright, president and CEO of Wal-Mart's U.S. store division, briefly acknowledged the theft problem in a mid-May conference call with analysts. He cited shrinkage as well as increased markdowns and higher inventory for dragging down first-quarter profit margins.

    "We are concerned about shrinkage and are investigating the cause and are taking steps to correct it," Castro-Wright said. Company officials won't comment on those countermeasures. The company also said in a June 1 filing with federal securities regulators that its gross profit margin fell by 0.1% in the first quarter due in part to "higher inventory shrinkage."

    John Simley, a Wal-Mart spokesman, declined to elaborate. He would say only that the company's theft losses as a percentage of sales is "better than our industry peer groups."

    Analysts say it's significant that the company has publicly disclosed that theft is becoming a problem. "It is getting to the point of being material," said Richard Hastings, vice president and senior retail sector analyst at Bernard Sands. Securities regulations require companies to alert shareholders to significant corporate developments that could affect the value of their holdings.

    $45,000 from the store safe

    Such pilferage as a percentage of sales has been declining since the mid-1990s as retailers have invested in new technology, such as closed-circuit TVs, according to Richard Hollinger, professor of criminology at the University of Florida.

    About 47% of the dollars lost came from employee theft, while shoplifting accounted for about 32%, according to the National Retail Federation report. Administrative errors account for 14%, while supplier fraud accounts for 4%. The remaining 3% is unaccounted for.

    In one of the more brazen employee thefts, a man wearing dark clothing and a ski mask entered a Port Clinton, Ohio, Wal-Mart store in January at midnight unnoticed by employees and stole $45,000 from the store safe. The store's night manager, Dana Walker, 30, was later arrested for the crime. He became a suspect because he knew the combination to the safe, police said.

    The company's vociferous critic WakeUpWalMart.com, funded by the United Food and Commercial Workers, which has for years tried to organize the retailer's workers, publicized the company's decision last year to relax its zero-tolerance policy on shoplifting. The new policy seeks prosecutions of first-time offenders only if they are between ages 18 to 65 and steal at least $25 worth of merchandise.

    That change may have emboldened some folks to shoplift, said Mark Doyle, president of Jack L. Hayes International, a retail consultancy on loss prevention.

    WakeUpWalMart.com and some former employees said Wal-Mart may also have been trying to appease complaints by some police departments that its stores tied up police with too many shoplifting calls. Wal-Mart has denied that.

    Wal-Mart also may have been spooked by worries about lawsuits from wrongful death, unlawful imprisonment and other legal issues related to aggressively chasing down shoplifters. In March, Wal-Mart agreed to pay $750,000 to the family of a suspected shoplifter who suffocated to death in 2005 as loss prevention workers held him down in a parking lot outside a store in Atascocita, Texas.

    'Being run by bean counters'

    The change in policy came at the same time the company began using more part-time workers -- in part because of a new scheduling system that matches staffing more closely to peak shopping hours -- and shifting security personnel, analysts and critics say. That has left the discount chain without an experienced and loyal staff to monitor what's strolling out its back and front doors, analysts and some former employees supplied by WakeUpWalMart.com said.

    "The business is being run by bean counters. I am shocked at the Spartan level of staffing," said Flickinger, managing director of Strategic Resources Group. He added, "There are also morale issues. Workers feel that the company is taking care of itself."

    While Wal-Mart denies that it has cut anti-theft jobs overall, it says it has adjusted staffing to put more personnel in stores in high-crime areas and fewer in stores with less trouble.

    Skimpy pay and benefits

    However, Dan Meyer, a former district loss prevention supervisor for several Wal-Mart stores in New Jersey, disputes that. Meyer, who said he accepted a buyout last fall after almost 12 years with the company, said Wal-Mart reduced the number of loss prevention staff in each store last year and redesigned their jobs in a way that was less active and more administrative.

    "That's why shrinkage is up," he said.

    Meyer said he averaged 13 apprehensions a month during most of his time at Wal-Mart. That number dropped to three to four a month in the months before he left last October. Meyer said his totals dropped because there were fewer security staff and less support from his managers for aggressively rooting out theft.

    WakeUpWalMart.com has linked rising theft to its claims that the company offers skimpy pay and benefits. Wal-Mart also faces a class-action lawsuit alleging female workers were passed over for men in pay and promotions.

    "I am not the type to steal, but because we are so mistreated, when I saw things I just didn't do anything," said Gina Tuley, a former Wal-Mart bakery worker, who quit her job at the Seagoville, Texas, store in March. A big complaint was that her hours had been cut, reducing her take-home pay.

    Wal-Mart defends its pay as competitive and its health-care coverage as better than most retailers, and has denied gender discrimination.

    Wal-Mart's Simley said an April survey of employees that showed rising job satisfaction suggests Tuley's attitude does not represent most Wal-Mart associates.

    Even so, several former associates said in interviews that their bonuses have declined because of the rise in inventory losses.

    The shrinking bonus

    Wal-Mart's Simley disputes these claims, saying theft reduction was dropped from the bonus formula about a dozen years ago. It was Walton's idea to tie associates' bonuses to their stores' pilferage levels to give them a vested interest in keeping theft in check. Tuley said her bonus last year was $300, down from $800 the previous year.

    "People would walk out with bags of merchandise. . . . I heard the alarms go off, and people wouldn't even look," she said.

    14 June

    Thanks again sis!

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    I need to give credit for this entry to Justin's mom who sent this to us.
     
     Kat, I thought of you first by the way!
     
     
     
    My son came home from school one day,
    with a smirk upon his face.
    He decided he was smart enough,
    to put me in my place.

    "Guess what I learned in Civics Two,
    that's taught by Mr. Wright?
    It's all about the laws today,
    The 'Children's Bill of Rights.'

    It says I need not clean my room,
    don't have to cut my hair
    No one can tell me what to think,
    or speak, or what to wear.

    I have freedom from religion,
    and regardless what you say,
    I don't have to bow my head,
    and I sure don't have to pray.

    I can wear earrings if I want,
    and pierce my tongue & nose.
    I can read & watch just what I like,
    get tattoos from head to toe.

    And if you ever spank me,
    I'll charge you with a crime.
    I'll back up all my charges,
    with the marks on my behind.

    Don't you ever touch me,
    my body's only for my use,
    not for your hugs and kisses,
    that's just more child abuse.

    Don't preach about your morals,
    like your Mama did to you.
    That's nothing more than mind control,
    And it's illegal too!

    Mom, I have these children's rights,
    so you can't influence me,
    or I'll call Children's Services Division,
    better known
    as "C.S.D."
     
    Mom's Reply and Thoughts

    Of course my first instinct was
    to toss him out the door.
    But the chance to teach him a lesson
    made me think a little more.

    I mulled it over carefully,
    I couldn't let this go.
    A smile crept upon my face,
    he's messing with a pro.

    Next day I took him shopping
    at the local Goodwill Store..
    I told him, "Pick out all you want,
    there's shirts & pants galore.

    I've called and checked with C.S.D .
    who said they didn't care
    if I bought you K-Mart shoes
    instead of Nike Airs.

    I've canceled that appointment
    to take your driver's test.
    The C.S.D. is unconcerned
    so I'll decide what's best."

    I said "No time to sto p an d eat,
    or pi ck up stuff to munch.
    And tomorrow you can start to learn
    to make your own sack lunch.

    Just save the raging appetite,
    and wait till dinner time.
    We're having liver and onions,
    a favorite dish of mine."

    He asked "Can I please rent a movie,
    to watch on my VCR?"
    "Sorry, but I sold your TV,
    for new tires on my car.

    I also rented! out your room,
    you'll take the couch instead.
    The C.S.D. requires
    just a roof over your head.

    Your clothing won't be trendy now,
    I'll choose what we eat.
    That allowance that you used to get,
    will buy me something neat.

    I'm selling off your jet ski,
    dirt-bike & roller blades.
    Check out the 'Parents Bill of Rights',
    It's in effect today!

    Hey hot shot, are you crying,
    Why are you on your knees?
    Are you asking God to help you out,
    instead of C.S.D..?"

    12 June

    Explanation

    Hello everyone!

     

    Well, I found the explanation of what he was thinking so maybe this will help but I like my ideas better. Where is everyone?

     

    'The Sopranos'
    © HBO
    'The Sopranos'

    'Sopranos' Creator: Movie No Sure Thing
    Jun 12, 7:20 AM EST

    The Associated Press

    NEWARK, N.J. -- "Sopranos" fans who thought the series' open-ended conclusion was a setup for a movie may be in for disappointment: creator David Chase says it isn't so.

    Chase said he would leave it to fans to interpret the show's last scene for themselves. It featured the members of the Soprano family arriving for dinner as Journey's "Don't Stop Believin'" plays. Others in the restaurant include a man in a Member's Only jacket who goes to the bathroom, which some fans have interpreted as a nod to the scene in "The Godfather" in which Michael Corleone retrieves a gun from the bathroom before a shooting.

    Chase went to France before the airing of the much-debated finale of the HBO series because he wanted to avoid what he called "all the Monday morning quarterbacking." But like a true New Jersey loyalist, he granted one interview to The Star-Ledger of Newark, which posted his comment early Tuesday on its Web site.

    "I don't think about (a movie) much," he told the paper. "I never say never. An idea could pop into my head where I would go, `Wow, that would make a great movie,' but I doubt it.

    "I'm not being coy," he added. "If something appeared that really made a good `Sopranos' movie and you could invest in it and everybody else wanted to do it, I would do it. But I think we've kind of said it and done it."

    "I have no interest in explaining, defending, reinterpreting, or adding to what is there," said Chase, 61, who grew up in North Caldwell.

    "People get the impression that you're trying to (mess) with them, and it's not true. You're trying to entertain them," he said. "Anybody who wants to watch it, it's all there."

    Another problem with a movie is that so many characters died in the last season. Chase said he has considered "going back to a day in 2006 that you didn't see, but then (Tony's children) would be older than they were then and you would know that Tony doesn't get killed.

    "I don't think about (a movie) much," he told the paper. "I never say never. An idea could pop into my head where I would go, `Wow, that would make a great movie,' but I doubt it.

    "I'm not being coy," he added. "If something appeared that really made a good `Sopranos' movie and you could invest in it and everybody else wanted to do it, I would do it. But I think we've kind of said it and done it."

    Chase said he would leave it to fans to interpret the show's last scene for themselves. It featured the members of the Soprano family arriving for dinner as Journey's "Don't Stop Believin'" plays. Others in the restaurant include a man in a Member's Only jacket who goes to the bathroom, which some fans have interpreted as a nod to the scene in "The Godfather" in which Michael Corleone retrieves a gun from the bathroom before a shooting.

    As the music and tension build, the screen suddenly goes silent and dark.

    "I have no interest in explaining, defending, reinterpreting, or adding to what is there," said Chase, 61, who grew up in North Caldwell.

    "People get the impression that you're trying to (mess) with them, and it's not true. You're trying to entertain them," he said. "Anybody who wants to watch it, it's all there."

    Another problem with a movie is that so many characters died in the last season. Chase said he has considered "going back to a day in 2006 that you didn't see, but then (Tony's children) would be older than they were then and you would know that Tony doesn't get killed.

    It's got problems."

    Chase also elaborated on how he decided to make the Journey classic the last music played on the series.

    "It didn't take much time at all to pick it, but there was a lot of conversation after the fact. I did something I'd never done before: In the location van, with the crew, I was saying, `What do you think?' When I said, `Don't Stop Believin',' people went, `What? Oh my God!'

    "I said, `I know, I know, just give a listen,' and little by little, people started coming around."

    11 June

    You have got to be joking!

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    I heard a tidbit of this story on the news and googled to find the entire story to share. This idiot really thinks that will work?
     
    Wesley Snipes plays the race card for not paying his taxes!
     

    Actor claims "selective prosecution" in felony tax avoidance case

     JUNE 8--Facing trial in a bizarre tax avoidance scheme, actor Wesley Snipes claims that prosecutors used race as a factor in deciding to charge him with failure to file six years worth of IRS returns. In a motion to dismiss an eight-count indictment filed last October, Snipes argues that he is the victim of selective prosecution. Snipes points to the fact that his two "Caucasian" codefendants, Douglas Rosile and Eddie Kahn, have not been charged with failure to file tax returns, though investigators are aware that Kahn did not file returns for six years and that it was "possible" Rosile did not file for two years. Snipes, who was hit with six felonies for failing to file between 1999-2004, contends that the half-dozen counts were "impermissibly brought on the basis of Mr. Snipes' race" and should be "dismissed based on selective prosecution." Snipes, Rosile, and Kahn have been accused of attempting to defraud the government by claiming that the actor was immune to taxation based on the "861 argument." That claim, which has long been rejected by IRS officials, referred to a section of the federal tax code. Along with playing the race card, the Snipes motion, an excerpt of which you'll find below, claims that the celebrity was actually a victim of "unscrupulous tax advice," not a willing participant in a criminal conspiracy hatched by Rosile and Kahn. As such, a second motion notes, Snipes is mulling a lawsuit against his two codefendants "to recover the losses he suffered as a result of his reliance upon the advice given to him."

    To read this rest of this nonsense, click here

    Thoughts from Christopher

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    I was surfing the 'net and found a story from NY about the Sopranos. I have my idea of how I would have ended the series and will share it with you now that the series is over. Comments please!
     
    The Sopranos' Cast Cheer Last Episode

    HOLLYWOOD, Fla. (AP) -- Hey, you got a problem with how "The Sopranos" wound up? Take it up with  Christopher, if you dare.

    "I think it's a great ending. It's a good way to go out," said Michael Imperioli, who played Tony's nephew, until he got whacked this season.

    Imperioli and  fellow cast members told reporters they were pleased with the finale as they walked the red carpet at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino on Sunday.

    "We're all heartbroken. We could go on forever. Me and Edie Falco wanna die on the set," Tony Sirico said, sporting his character Paulie's trademark silver wings.

    The characteristically shy  James Gandolfini, who played New Jersey mob boss Tony, was mum on his thoughts on the ending. He sported a beard and sunglasses and was sweating in the muggy South Florida weather as he smiled and waved to the large crowd of fans that gathered for his send-off.

    Lorraine Bracco's character, Dr. Jennifer Melfi, didn't appear in the series finale. Melfi abruptly terminated Tony's therapy in last week's episode.

    "She ended a strong confident woman and I loved that," Bracco said at the cast party.

    Steven Van Zandt, who played Tony's consigliere Sil, said cryptically of the finale, "We're not sure it's ending."

    Series creator David Chase's dangling ending seems primed for the big screen. Although there's been no serious talk of making a film, "a couple of years from now, who knows?" Van Zandt said.

    Arthur Nascarella, who played Carlo on the show, also didn't rule out the possibility of a future for the show.

    "Wait three years and get back to me," Nascarella said.

     

    Okay, for those of you who are curious, I would have ended the show this way (and they could still do it for the big screen are you listening out there David Chase?)

    After the big hype dies down and they shoot a new movie to wrap up all of the loose ends that couldn't possibly be done in a hour episode, I would have Tony talking to Uncle Junior in an old folk's home. Tony's mom would have died like in the series and Tony, Carmella and the kids will be living in a house just like (or even the actual one) that his mom lived in. Tony is a plumber, Carmella is a PTA mom and the kids are pretty much the same but they have regular friends with regular problems. Uncle Junior and Tony are catching up with life and that's when it's revealed that Uncle Junior is a great storyteller and Meadow becomes another great writer/director. The movie ends with Meadow on the set shooting this great movie called the Sopranos. Great twist that would work with either everybody who was on the show to have a career for as long as they wanted or start over with a new cast.

     

    I am seriously thinking of sending my idea to David Chase so please don't steal my idea but I would love your comments!

    10 June

    The final episode of the Sopranos

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    Beloved and I haven't had HBO since I was hurt since it cost too much money in our budget so we have had to watch the repeats on A&E which has helped. For those of who don't want to know how the last episode played out, please leave now.
     
    Spoiler alert
     
    *
     
     
    *
     
     
    *
     
     
    *
     
     
    *
     
    A Bang-Up Finale For 'The Sopranos'

    It may have been the greatest double-take -- by the audience -- in the history of American television.

    Millions of viewers who might have thought something had gone wrong with their TV sets or cable systems last night were mistaken. When the picture vanished at the end, the very end, of "The Sopranos" and the screen went black, that was producer David Chase's unorthodox and arguably ingenious way of ending the series and dispatching the Soprano family to eternity.

    Chase set up the audience to expect an assassination, perhaps of the whole Soprano family: Tony, Carmela, Anthony Jr. and Meadow, who were sitting in a nostalgically old-fashioned diner about to order dinner. Menacing strangers entered. One went into the men's room, a seeming reference to a famous shooting in "The Godfather" in which a gun was hidden in a water closet.

    And then -- while Journey's "Don't Stop Believing" played on a vintage jukebox and the family members made everyday small talk -- the Sopranos disappeared. No shots were fired. Whether they all would have been killed in the next scene, or lived several more years, or even made it to old age, was not specified.

    These great mythic characters, who have captivated HBO viewers for nearly a decade, are now suspended in space and the national imagination forever.

    An attentive HBO executive who was watching the episode for the second time said the last image, of Tony's face, was seen just as the words "don't stop" were sung on the jukebox. The episode was littered with references to mortality -- life, death, even the Apocalypse in a poem by William Butler Yeats. Only Chase could mix Yeats with the theme from "The Twilight Zone" and Simon & Garfunkel's "Cecilia" played as a cellphone chime and make it all jell.

    As always, "The Sopranos" was a catalogue of references from the mundane to the profound, but the finale was the biggest guessing game of all: Who would die, who would live? Fans of the show hoping to see the evil Phil Leotardo get his saw one of the grisliest deaths in the series:

    After being shot in the head, Leotardo falls dead to a gas station driveway. The SUV from which he'd emerged proceeds to run over his skull, crushing it and causing his two little grandchildren in their car seats to feel a little bump. It was macabre and bizarre in a way that only "Sopranos" could bring off.

    Throughout the episode, Chase paid farewell visits to many of the regular "Sopranos" haunts, including the Bada Bing Club ("the Bing" to its mob owners), Satriale's Pork Store, and the Soprano home once the family felt safe enough to move out of hiding and back into it. In the end, Tony's problem with the feuding mob boss Leotardo was solved with the help of an FBI agent, who could in his way have been as morally corrupt as Tony in his.

    But "The Sopranos" was not judgmental. It could be maddeningly neutral and even amoral; Tony Soprano, so powerfully played by James Gandolfini, could be a vicious killer one moment and dear old daddy the next. He loomed a giant figure from the first episode to last night's blistering and shattering finale.

    Even posthumous characters showed up or were mentioned last night. Tony's malicious mother is still in his thoughts: "I never could please my mother," Tony said sorrowfully to his son's new therapist. Tony's own therapist, in an unlikely turn of events, dropped him as a patient last week, but now Tony's very, very confused son is seeking a shrink of his own. So the torch is passed to a new generation.

    At a mental hospital, Tony visited the notorious old Uncle Junior, who was once instructed by Tony's own mother to kill him and later, in the throes of dotage and Alzheimer's, shot Tony in the stomach. Uncle Junior, dazed and deluded, exists somewhere between the living and the dead.

    And Tony's nephew Christopher, whose life Tony himself ended in a recent episode, returned as a photo on the wall that a stray cat for some reason stared at obsessively -- even when the photo was moved to another spot.

    HBO has had greater success with "The Sopranos" than any premium cable network has ever had with any series -- not just in terms of audience size but in terms of inspiring conversations, arguments, discussions and re-viewings of episodes.

    Wherever two or three are gathered around a water cooler this morning, "The Sopranos" is likely to be a subject of discussion.

    It's a classic now, and one that will live on for years.

    A day in my life

     

     

    Hello everyone!

     

    It’s been awhile since I spoke about my job and I decided that I can tell you a little bit more to give you an idea of what I go through everyday.

     

    First of all, I am not entirely happy with the amount of my raise but my boss will be reconsidering what she might have thought of giving me when I make it to one year the way things have been going for sure.

     

    When I started back in October, I was one of four hired. That made it a total of twelve job coaches on staff and now there are only six of us. In the last month, the most senior job coach decided that she wanted to go “inside” to help run the new program called “Life Skills” where the not as high functioning adults learn to operate simple things to us like a washer and dryer, use the stove etc. I spoke to her after two weeks and she said it’s nothing like she thought it was and wasn’t sure she was going to stay. What she forgot is that the adults that she has been coaching for years are a lot more high functioning and that the adults that she is helping now really need her help. Of course when you aren’t like the adults that we work with in the community don’t ask you everyday the same questions over and over again.

     

    One of the other job coaches that started the same time I did, C. had been having trouble paying bills when our adults weren’t 100% any longer. (Remember when they first started their jobs we were there 100% of their shift and as they got better our time with them dropped to 90%, 80% and now nearly all of them are down to 25%.) This is a great testament to both our adults and our job coaching skills but naturally unless you have new adults to coach, your hours will naturally drop as they don’t need you as much. For a time to keep the job coaches hours up, we went back to the protected workshop where the adults (most of which will never be able to work in the community) do simple jobs like put Band-AidsÒ from a large box into individual boxes, put labels on dog food, etc. Very important work and of course the company I work for won’t be as expensive as the big guys and our adults do very important work giving them satisfaction that they did a good job and earn a paycheck which of course makes them feel really good that they did something with their hands. Now some of these adults are blind, have MS, Severe Down’s Syndrome, etc. but they have been to a class to see what their abilities are and the protected workshop is divided into sections that match their skills so that no one will be with someone who’s skills are either faster or slower. There is a section where the adults cannot count so they play a match game and place the Band-AidsÒ on the picture page until the right count is there and then they place them in the individual boxes. Of course, they don’t get paid the same as the adults who can count or work faster.

     

    Anyway, there was a time a while back that hours for the job coaches were low and we were asked if we wanted to work in the protected workshop. Most of us said yes and we were all sent an email reminding us of the rules and to let all of us know that the supervisors will notify our boss if it appears that we are working slower to our potential since of course we get paid by the hour not by the piece like most of the adults. Some of the job coaches figured that if they worked just a little bit slower, we would get more hours to finish the job but were dead wrong. (There is a small section of the protected workshop where the adults that end up working in the community at large are evaluated so we weren’t in an area where the other adults would feel bad since we would work a lot faster.) Those job coaches who chose to ignore the warnings were asked to not only not come back tomorrow, but ever! Stupid since they could have had the opportunity to make money if the hours in the community get cut again. There are no second chances for job coaches to come back in the protected workshop. Of course I worked at my natural pace and the newest job coach, B. did so as well. We both were told that we did two days of work in one and were welcome back in the protected workshop anytime they needed us!

     

    Anyway, C. found out that there was an opening for 40 hours working Monday through Friday at the facility as a housekeeping job coach. It paid the same and the adults are not quite as high functioning as the ones that are out in the field but higher than the ones in the “life skills” class. She now coaches five adults to clean the restrooms and offices at both buildings. The only problem that she has found is that if they don’t show up for work and/or don’t finish the job, she has to do it herself! That’s only happened twice when she first started and she is so glad that she transferred inside. She sees her kids every night for dinner and has every weekend off. But for me, it wouldn’t have worked. I need to have “freedom” to be in the community and working in an office is not my cup of tea.

     

    Well, that’s about it for now but please check back soon because I have more to tell!

     

    Remember to comment no lurking please!

     

     

     

    09 June

    I need your help please

     
     Hello everyone!
     
    I was trying to catch up with my friends and found that Stephen's account was closed. Has anyone spoke to him lately and know how he's doing and if he has another account somewhere? I would really like to talk to him and feel bad that I haven't been able to comment on his space for awhile since I started working this weird hours.
     
    Thanks for helping guys!

    How gross!

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    I was surfing the 'net and found a story that was just gross but had to try to get some more traffic to my space, here you go ~ Please comment and not stalk!
     
     
    Sex Under I-71 Overpass Leads To Two Arrests

     

    RELATED PICTURES
    Click for larger images.

    click for larger image
    Kelly Weyrich/Moore
    (WCPO/WCPO.com)

    click for larger image
    Danny Woods
    (WCPO/WCPO.com)


    Two Cincinnati residents have admitted to police that they were having sex under an overpass on I-71.

    It's a story you'll see first on WCPO.com.

    Police responded to the northbound lane of the Fort Washington Way overpass on Friday afternoon around 1:30 a.m.

    They arrested 49-year-old Danny Woods, and 43-year-old Kelly Weyrich, both of Cincinnati. Both have since confessed.

    Their listed addresses suggest they might be residents of Cincinnati's homeless shelter, the Drop Inn Center.

    Police records show that when officers responded to the scene, they found Weyrich naked.

    At least one witness called 9-1-1 telling authorities that she saw the pair engaging in sexual activity.

    A police report on Woods says the alleged act was "very visible to the public."

    08 June

    If you care

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    I can stomach this more than Anna Nicole but this has many layers to it and would like to ask a question at the end of this entry okay?
     
     
     
    Paris Hilton
    © MSNBC
    Paris Hilton
    Judge Orders Paris Hilton Back to Jail
    Jun 8, 6:07 PM EST

    The Associated Press

    LOS ANGELES -- Paris Hilton was sent screaming and crying back to jail Friday after a judge ruled that she must serve out her sentence behind bars rather than in the comfort of her Hollywood Hills home.

    "It's not right!" shouted Hilton, who violated her probation in a reckless driving case. "Mom!" she cried out to her mother.

    Hours earlier, the 26-year-old hotel heiress was taken handcuffed from her home in a black-and-white police car, paparazzi sprinting in pursuit and helicopters broadcasting live from above. She entered the courtroom disheveled and weeping, hair askew, without makeup, wearing a fuzzy gray sweat shirt over slacks.

    She cried throughout the hearing, dabbing her eyes, and her body shook constantly. Several times she turned to her parents, seated behind her in the courtroom, and mouthed, "I love you."

    Hilton was taken to a treatment center at the downtown Twin Towers jail for medical and psychiatric examination to determine which facility she will be held in, said sheriff's spokesman Steve Whitmore.

    "She'll be there for at least a couple of days," he said.

    Despite being ordered to serve the remainder of her original 45-day sentence, Hilton could still be released early. Inmates are given a day off their terms for every four days of good behavior, and her days in home detention counted as time served.

    Superior Court Judge Michael T. Sauer was calm but apparently irked by Sheriff Lee Baca's decision to release Hilton three days into her sentence due to an unspecified "medical condition."

    "I at no time condoned the actions of the sheriff and at no time told him I approved the actions," Sauer said. "At no time did I approve the defendant being released from custody to her home."

    The hearing was requested by the city attorney's office, which had prosecuted Hilton and wanted Baca held in contempt for releasing Hilton despite Sauer's express order that she must serve her time in jail.

    The judge took no action on the contempt request.

    A member of the county counsel's staff said Baca was willing to come to court with medical personnel. The judge did not take him up on the offer.

    Assistant City Attorney Dan F. Jeffries argued that Hilton's incarceration was purely up to the judge. "Her release after only three days erodes confidence in the judicial system," he said.

    Hilton's attorney, Richard Hutton, implored the judge to order a hearing in his chambers to hear testimony about Hilton's medical condition before making a decision. The judge did not respond to that suggestion.

    Another of her attorneys, Steve Levine, said, "The sheriff has determined that because of her medical situation, (jail) is a dangerous place for her."

    "The court's role here is to let the Sheriff's Department run the jail," he said.

    The judge interrupted several times to say that he had received a call last Wednesday from an undersheriff informing him that Hilton had a medical condition and that he would submit papers to the judge to consider. He said the papers never arrived.

    Every few minutes, the judge would interrupt proceedings, state the time on the clock, and note that the papers still had not arrived.

    He also noted that he had heard that a private psychiatrist visited Hilton in jail, and he wondered if that person played a role in deciding her medical needs.

    The last attorney to speak was another deputy city attorney, David Bozanich, who declared, "This is a simple case. There was a court. The Sheriff's Department chose to violate that order. There is no ambiguity."

    Hilton's twisted jailhouse saga began Sept. 7, when she failed a sobriety test after police saw her weaving down a street in her Mercedes-Benz on what she said was a late-night hamburger run.

    She pleaded no contest to reckless driving and was sentenced to 36 months' probation, alcohol education and $1,500 in fines. In the months that followed she was stopped twice while driving on a suspended license. The second stop landed her in Sauer's courtroom.

    Back before Sauer on Friday, Hilton's entire body trembled as the final pitch was made for her further incarceration. She clutched a ball of tissue and tears ran down her face.

    Seconds later, the judge announced his decision: "The defendant is remanded to county jail to serve the remainder of her 45-day sentence. This order is forthwith."

    Hilton screamed.

    Eight deputies immediately ordered all spectators out of the courtroom. Hilton's mother, Kathy, threw her arms around her husband, Rick, and sobbed uncontrollably.

    Deputies escorted Hilton out of the room, holding each of her arms as she looked back.

     

    A lot of people seem to forget that this started with Paris getting caught driving DUI that she pled guilty to and she was given probation and told not to drive for three months. She got caught again driving but this last time without a valid driver's license. So the judge gives her 45 days in jail because she violated her parole and wrote that she must serve time in jail and no work release program or ankle bracelet. She serves three days that she gets credit for five days. The judge finds out that she was let loose to "serve her time" at home because of a mystery illness that I heard last night was that she wasn't sleeping and wanted out. Today's news conference spoke a bit about her mental status and that "she is too fragile" to serve time in jail. The judge said she is going to serve her 23 days in jail (cut down because of the overcrowding) and I personally think she should have served the entire 45 days.

    Paris is one of the dumbest people that thinks she is something that she clearly isn't. She claimed that she didn't want to be treated any different and she "can't handle the truth!" What do you guys think?

     

    Update:

    Paris decided that she would not fight the sentence and actually be an adult about it. I have a tiny bit of respect for her now but we will see if she really does it. Now the Sheriff's Department and the Head idiot especially have an image problem that will take a long time to go away if ever now. The courts give sentences and the Sheriffs are supposed to care it out. If the jails/prisons are too full, I have an idea to make it better overnight ~ send all of the illegals back to their country and make that country put them in their jail system! We wouldn't have to keep letting people out early and/or build new prisons to house this jerks. WE also have to be more like Texas, from sentencing to execution it's about ten years max and all of the states should do the same and that would clear out even more room for the bad guys right?

    01 June

    And we liked that show!

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    I don't know if you guys have watched this show or not, but I had an uneasy feeling when they started showing this guy flipping houses. We still like Richard Davis (who left by the way because he felt ripped off and now is on another show but still flipping houses in SC) but when they started showing this guy in GA and the brothers in TX, we stopped watching it because it wasn't as good or real as with Richard Davis. By the way, I tried to find a picture of this jerk but they have wiped him off of the website. There was one episode that showed Lamont (the huge black guy who was the foreman of all the jobs) found a house and wanted to sell it to someone who was in the music business. They won't show the episode but that might help you place his face of the idiot to tried to pull a fast one.
     
     
     

    'Flip This House' Star Accused of Fraud

    Friday, June 01, 2007

    By DOUG GROSS, Associated Press Writer

    ATLANTA — On an episode of A&E's popular reality series "Flip This House," Atlanta businessman Sam Leccima sits in front of a run-down house and calls buying and selling real estate his passion.

    Now authorities and legal filings claim that Leccima's true passion was a series of scams that included faking the home renovations shown on the cable TV show and claiming to have sold houses he never owned.

    "This is, indeed, a con artist," said Sonya McGee, an Atlanta pharmaceutical representative who says Leccima took $4,000 from her in an investment scheme.

    McGee and others say Leccima's episodes of "Flip This House," A&E's most popular show, were elaborate hoaxes. His friends and family were presented as potential homebuyers and "sold" signs were slapped in front of unsold houses. They say the home repairs _ the lynchpin of the show _ were actually quick or temporary patch jobs designed to look good on camera.

    Leccima says he never claimed to own the homes. While not acknowledging his televised renovations were staged, he didn't deny it and suggested that A&E and Departure Films, the production company that makes the show, knew exactly what he was doing.

    "Ask anybody who works in television how a reality show is made and you'll find that ours was a very typical approach," Leccima said in a telephone interview.

    When it recently learned of the claims against Leccima, the cable network pulled reruns of his episodes off the air and wiped his mentions from its Web site.

    Leccima, 36, presented himself as a successful real estate investor during the 2006 season of the cable show, which depicted him buying, refurbishing and reselling Atlanta-area homes for profits of $77,000 and more. But Leccima doesn't have a real estate license _ it was revoked by the Georgia Real Estate Commission in 2005, with the panel ruling he "does not bear a good reputation for honesty, trustworthiness, integrity, and competence." Now he's under investigation by the Georgia Secretary of State's office for securities fraud.

    Leccima said his lawyer advised him against talking about the investigation or the claims made by McGee and others. He did say that some of the criticism stems from his high profile.

    "I'm a business person and I think I have as many people that like me as don't like me," he said. "Anyone who puts their face on national television should realize they've signed a Faustian deal of sorts."

    However, Atlanta-area real estate records show Leccima never owned several of the homes he's been shown fixing up on television.

    WAGA-TV in Atlanta, which first aired the claims against Leccima, has shown footage from inside one of the homes, which had mismatched wooden floors and unpainted patched walls that were out of the view of TV cameras on "Flip This House."

    McGee said she attended what was billed as a wrap party at one home. But when the party was shown on "Flip This House," it was presented as an open house at which someone expresses interest in buying the property.

    New York-based Departure Films did not return repeated telephone calls to its offices by The Associated Press. A&E spokesman Dan Silberman said the network has stopped working with Leccima, who doesn't appear in this season's episodes.

    "We are dismayed to learn of these allegations," read a statement issued by the network. "A&E Television Networks is not a party to any of the transactions shown in Flip This House and has not received any formal complaints about the properties or sales."

    Silberman said the network _ a joint venture of Hearst Corp., Walt Disney Co. and General Electric Co.'s NBC Universal _ doesn't investigate claims made by people on the show, opting to take them at their word.

    The Better Business Bureau gives Leccima's company, Leccima Capital Partners, LLP, an "unsatisfactory" rating, saying four complaints have been filed against it in three years.

    One of the complaint was from McGee, who said she considered Leccima a friend _ even vacationing in Brazil with him and his wife. She said the Leccimas stopped returning her calls once she started asking for her money back.

    Dan Ward, an Atlanta-area youth minister, said he told state investigators that Leccima took about $100,000 from him to invest in real estate, but, as far as he knows, Leccima never developed anything with it. He hasn't received his money back.

    McGee said appearing on the TV show made it easier for Leccima to find such investors: "As soon as that first episode aired, he got phone calls from people saying, 'I love you. Where can I send you some money?'"

     

    What I would like to know is didn't A&E do any background on the guy? I mean if his license was pulled in 2005 and the episodes featuring he and his wife aired in 2006, what does that say about them? Something to think about!

    Is this a good idea to you?

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    I found this story and can see both sides of this issue and do have an opinion but would like to see what you guys think about this first. Comments please!
     
     
    Keeping its lower-income clientele out of the emergency room is part of the retail giant's prescription for a more wholesome bottom line.
     
    By Reuters
    5/30/2007 12:01AM EST

    In a few years, it could be just as common for a Wal-Mart shopper to head to the retailer for an allergy shot or a strep-throat test as it is to swing by for food or clothes.

    After a pilot program, Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs) has announced plans to open as many as 400 in-store health clinics in the next two to three years. That number could jump to 2,000 in five to seven years if current conditions persist.

    With Wal-Mart facing sluggish U.S. sales growth, analysts said the clinics give the retailer a means to improve sales by keeping its base of lower-income shoppers in its stores longer and keeping them out of costly emergency rooms.

    "The health-care crisis and the inflation associated with it creates a lot of problems for their customers," said Richard Hastings, senior retail analyst at Bernard Sands. "They (Wal-Mart) are extremely exposed to the lower-income population's economic woes."

    An estimated 46 million Americans lack health insurance, and, according to the National Coalition on Health Care, health-care spending constitutes about 16% of the U.S. economy.

    With Americans trying to find cheaper health-care alternatives, Wal-Mart began testing in-store health clinics in September 2005, and it now has 76 clinics.

    The retailer does not operate the clinics. Instead, it leases in-store space to outside operators. The clinics provide basic preventive and health services -- like cholesterol screenings or treatment for sore throats.

    Squeezed by gas prices, housing bust

    A routine visit costs $40 to $65, excluding insurance. That is less than a similar visit to a primary-care physician, which could run between $80 and $110, excluding insurance, while an emergency room visit could be at least $250, said Alicia Ledlie, senior director of Wal-Mart's health business development.

    Ledlie said its in-store clinic operators found that more than half of the customers who used the clinics said they had no health insurance, and nearly 15% said they would have gone to an emergency room if the clinic was not there.

    That was the hypothesis, but to see that proven out in the data really, to us, felt like this was the right time to go forward in a bigger way," Ledlie said.

    Hastings said keeping customers out of emergency rooms makes sense for Wal-Mart, whose lower-income shoppers are being squeezed by high gasoline prices and a slowing housing market. An unexpected emergency room trip could drain a shopper of dollars that would otherwise be spent at Wal-Mart, he said.

    '1-stop shopping'

    Ledlie said the clinics fit the idea of "one-stop shopping" -- a customer who has been treated for a sore throat can then fill a prescription at a Wal-Mart pharmacy and buy everything from chicken soup to cough drops before leaving.

    "There's a number of health and wellness solutions throughout the store. How do we make sure customers are aware of them?" Ledlie said of the challenge Wal-Mart faces.

    Hastings said incremental sales are crucial to Wal-Mart, where margins are compressed by the emphasis on low prices.

    "It's all about conversion and marginal sales," he said. "Marginal sales are the backbone of the Wal-Mart system."

    But Wal-Mart is not the only retailer pursuing clinics.

    CVS/Caremark (CVS, news, msgs) is adding hundreds of Minute Clinic locations this year, and Walgreen (WAG, news, msgs) has said it plans to have 250 health clinics operating in its drugstores by the end of August.

    Standard & Poor's equity analyst Joseph Agnese said he favors having the clinics in drugstores because a Wal-Mart supercenter may be difficult to get to or be surrounded by a sprawling parking lot.

    "If you are sick, you are going to choose the most convenient location," he said.

    But Ledlie counters that argument, saying the top reason users cite for visiting a Wal-Mart clinic is convenience. Oppenheimer retail analyst Bernard Sosnick said Wal-Mart's success with its $4 generic prescription drug program could point to success with the clinics.

    Wal-Mart began selling certain generic drugs for $4 per monthly prescription in September and by the end of November had extended the program to all of its pharmacies -- far ahead of schedule.

    Sosnick said Wal-Mart could theoretically lease space to clinics at attractive rates so prices could remain low, but it would make up for the lower rent by increasing sales at its pharmacies or other departments.

    Analysts said in-store health clinics are not necessarily an either/or proposition -- either they succeed at Wal-Mart or they succeed at drugstores.

    "It's a big market, and there will be a place for each," Sosnick said.

    Instead, analysts see Wal-Mart clinics mainly as an attempt by the retailer to sell more to its own customers over time.

    "It should be accretive in three to five years," Hastings said. "This is an extremely long process."

    That was really stupid!

     
    Hello everyone!
     
    I don't know what this idiot was thinking and why she thought she could get away with it. All I have to say is that she is one of the dumbest people I have read about in a long time!
     
     
     
    Woman jailed for allegedly using state funds for cars, jewelry, investments
     

    MINNEAPOLIS - An errant computer keystroke led the state to accidentally issue a $2.5 million check to a school counselor — who spent thousands on cars, jewelry and electronics, prosecutors said.

    Sabrina Walker, 37, was charged Tuesday with theft by swindle and concealing the proceeds of a crime. She remained in jail Wednesday in lieu of $200,000 bail.

    The state's accounting system was handling money for the Department of Human Services that was intended for the Hennepin County Medical Center when the check was issued to Walker by mistake in March.

    Walker was in the state's system because she was once paid $84 as a court witness. Investigators found that Walker's vendor number in the state system was only one number off the hospital's nine-digit number.

    Walker, along with a man she lived with, allegedly bought a $500,000 certificate of deposit, funded two retirement accounts, bought a $500,000 Treasury bond, spent $5,500 on jewelry, $3,817 at Best Buy and $2,069 on limousine services, according to the criminal complaint.

    Walker also allegedly bought two cars, called the state to report the check, then bought two more cars, prosecutors said.

    She has been placed on leave until the case is resolved.

    Her criminal attorney, Mark Larsen, said there was more to the story than just the criminal complaint submitted by prosecutors. The complaint "fails to recite all the pertinent facts," he said.

    "This is a far cry from an individual who is turning her back on what has happened here," he said.

    The Department of Human Services obtained a judge's order freezing Walker's bank account. The agency said Wednesday it was working into improve internal controls on manual payments.

    That was a good thing

     
    Hello everyone!
     
     
     
    What would you have done? Comments please!
     

    Goodwill worker gets to keep pajamas jackpot

    21-year-old single mother of three found $5,000 in donated clothes

     

    GREENVILLE, S.C. - A Goodwill Industries worker who turned in more than $5,000 she found in donated pajama pants will get to keep the money because the owner could not be found.

    Kelli Owens, a 21-year-old single mother of three, was sorting donated clothes as part of her training at Goodwill earlier this month when she found the money. She took it straight to her supervisor.

    “She will get to keep the money,” Goodwill spokeswoman Crystal Hardesty said Friday. “It’s being invested into a scholarship fund.”

    ‘I just want everybody to be proud of me’
    Owens plans to go to Greenville Technical College to pursue a career in law enforcement.

    “I just want everybody to be proud of me — knowing that there is someone out there that is honest,” Owens told WYFF-TV on Thursday. “I couldn’t keep it because it belonged to somebody else, you know. I couldn’t live with myself knowing that.”

    The money was in an envelope with a note naming the intended recipient. The giver wrote that he or she hoped the money would be spent wisely.

    Goodwill officials talked to more than 30 people, but none could give the right description, the name on the letter or where the donation was dropped off.

    “We feel like we vetted it very well,” Hardesty said. “The story got a lot of publicity.”

    I wish it had happened to us!

    Hello everyone!

    When I saw this on the 'net this morning, that was my first thought; I wish it had happened to us so I could see beloved everyday!

    Lottery winner vows to finish auto-repair jobs

    Hard-working N.M. man who hit $62.8 million jackpot will then retire

     

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M — Felipe Pina of Los Ojos, N.M., plans to spend a couple of weeks finishing up the work left in his auto repair shop in Chama, then he's going to close it and retire.

    Pina, 57, came forward Wednesday to claim the $62.8 million Powerball jackpot sold May 23. The New Mexico Lottery announced last week that the winning ticket had been sold in the state and recommended the then-unidentified winner seek legal and financial advice before turning it in.

    Pina said, however, that in the rural part of northern New Mexico where he lives, it didn't take long before everyone knew. 

    Pina, who declined to answer personal questions about his family or business, said he buys a lottery ticket before the Powerball drawings every Wednesday and Saturday, usually at the same place that sold him the winning ticket, the Giant Sundial gasoline station in Chama.

    And he put this ticket where he always puts his lottery tickets — in his cup holder.

    After hearing the winner was from New Mexico, he checked the ticket last Thursday after leaving the shop he's operated for 21 years — Pina Truck and Auto Repair.

    "I laughed. I looked at it about three times," Pina said. "I put my reading glasses on."

    Girlfriend gets the news
    Then he went home to his girlfriend, asked her if she believed in miracles and told her, "I just hit the Powerball."

    His life, he said, will be different because he'll have "millions compared to thousands."

    Pina said he hasn't spent any of the winnings yet, but he'd like to buy a nice car, a nice house, pay bills, help his son Phillip Arthur with a college education "and maybe hit all 16 Oakland Raiders games."

    Eventually, he said, he might open another shop, this one to fix up classic cars. He already owns a '64 Ford Falcon Sprint and he'd like a '55 Chevy to fix up.

    He wouldn't say whether he intends to take the nearly $30 million cash payout or an annuity that would pay the full $62.8 million over 30 years. Lottery officials said taxes will take about 31 percent.

    Pina becomes New Mexico's fourth Powerball winner. A group of employees at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque claimed a $131 million Powerball jackpot in November 2000; Isabell Delgado of Las Cruces claimed a $32 million jackpot in February 2002; and John San Cartier, an airman from Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, won a $93.4 million Powerball in August 2005.